Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAmin, Samirkumar B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorYip, Wai-Kien_US
dc.contributor.authorMinvielle, Stephaneen_US
dc.contributor.authorBroyl, Annemieken_US
dc.contributor.authorLi, Yien_US
dc.contributor.authorHanlon, Breten_US
dc.contributor.authorSwanson, Daviden_US
dc.contributor.authorShah, Parantu K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMoreau, Philippeen_US
dc.contributor.authorvan der Holt, Bronnoen_US
dc.contributor.authorvan Duin, Marken_US
dc.contributor.authorMagrangeas, Florenceen_US
dc.contributor.authorSonneveld P., Pieteren_US
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Kenneth C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLi, Chengen_US
dc.contributor.authorAvet-Loiseau, Herveen_US
dc.contributor.authorMunshi, Nikhil C.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-02T12:22:34Z
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.citationAmin, S. B., W. Yip, S. Minvielle, A. Broyl, Y. Li, B. Hanlon, D. Swanson, et al. 2014. “Gene Expression Profile Alone Is Inadequate In Predicting Complete Response In Multiple Myeloma.” Leukemia 28 (11): 2229-2234. doi:10.1038/leu.2014.140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/leu.2014.140.en
dc.identifier.issn0887-6924en
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:16121090
dc.description.abstractWith advent of several treatment options in multiple myeloma, a selection of effective regimen has become an important issue. Use of GEP is considered an important tool in predicting outcome; however, it is unclear whether such genomic analysis alone can adequately predict therapeutic response. We evaluated ability of GEP to predict complete response in MM. GEP from pre-treatment MM cells from 136 uniformly treated MM patients with response data on an IFM, France led study were analyzed. To evaluate variability in predictive power due to microarray platform or treatment types, additional datasets from three different studies (n= 511) were analyzed using same methods. We used several machine learning methods to derive a prediction model using training and test subsets of the original four datasets. Among all methods employed for GEP-based CR predictive capability, we got accuracy range of 56% to 78% in test datasets and no significant difference with regard to GEP platforms, treatment regimens or in newly-diagnosed or relapsed patients. Importantly, permuted p-value showed no statistically significant CR predictive information in GEP data. This analysis suggests that GEP-based signature has limited power to predict CR in MM, highlighting the need to develop comprehensive predictive model using integrated genomics approach.en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.relation.isversionofdoi:10.1038/leu.2014.140en
dc.relation.hasversionhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4198516/pdf/en
dash.licenseLAAen_US
dc.subjectmultiple myelomaen
dc.subjectgene expression signatureen
dc.subjectresponse predictionen
dc.titleGene Expression Profile Alone Is Inadequate In Predicting Complete Response In Multiple Myelomaen
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.description.versionVersion of Recorden
dc.relation.journalLeukemiaen
dash.depositing.authorMunshi, Nikhil C.en_US
dc.date.available2015-06-02T12:22:34Z
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/leu.2014.140*
dash.authorsorderedfalse
dash.contributor.affiliatedMunshi, Nikhil


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record