Status boundary enforcement and the categorization of black–white biracials

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Status boundary enforcement and the categorization of black–white biracials

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: Status boundary enforcement and the categorization of black–white biracials
Author: Ho, Arnold K.; Sidanius, Jim; Cuddy, Amy J. C.; Banaji, Mahzarin R.

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Ho, Arnold K., Jim Sidanius, Amy J.C. Cuddy, and Mahzarin R. Banaji. 2013. “Status Boundary Enforcement and the Categorization of Black–white Biracials.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 49 (5) (September): 940–943.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Individuals who qualify equally for membership in more than one racial group are not judged as belonging equally to both of their parent groups, but instead are seen as belonging more to their lower status parent group. Why? The present paper begins to establish the role of individual differences and social context in hypodescent, the process of assigning multiracials the status of their relatively disadvantaged parent group. Specifically, in two experiments, we found that individual differences in social dominance orientation—a preference for group-based hierarchy and inequality—interacts with perceptions of socioeconomic threat to influence the use of hypodescent in categorizing half-Black, half-White biracial targets. Importantly, this paper begins to establish hypodescent as a “hierarchy-enhancing” social categorization.
Published Version: doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.04.010
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#OAP
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:17416812
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters