Handling changes in MRI acquisition parameters in modeling whole brain lesion volume and atrophy data in multiple sclerosis subjects: Comparison of linear mixed-effect models

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Handling changes in MRI acquisition parameters in modeling whole brain lesion volume and atrophy data in multiple sclerosis subjects: Comparison of linear mixed-effect models

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: Handling changes in MRI acquisition parameters in modeling whole brain lesion volume and atrophy data in multiple sclerosis subjects: Comparison of linear mixed-effect models
Author: Chua, Alicia S.; Egorova, Svetlana; Anderson, Mark C.; Polgar-Turcsanyi, Mariann; Chitnis, Tanuja; Weiner, Howard L.; Guttmann, Charles R.G.; Bakshi, Rohit; Healy, Brian C.

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Chua, Alicia S., Svetlana Egorova, Mark C. Anderson, Mariann Polgar-Turcsanyi, Tanuja Chitnis, Howard L. Weiner, Charles R.G. Guttmann, Rohit Bakshi, and Brian C. Healy. 2015. “Handling changes in MRI acquisition parameters in modeling whole brain lesion volume and atrophy data in multiple sclerosis subjects: Comparison of linear mixed-effect models.” NeuroImage : Clinical 8 (1): 606-610. doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2015.06.009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2015.06.009.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain provides important outcome measures in the longitudinal evaluation of disease activity and progression in MS subjects. Two common measures derived from brain MRI scans are the brain parenchymal fraction (BPF) and T2 hyperintense lesion volume (T2LV), and these measures are routinely assessed longitudinally in clinical trials and observational studies. When measuring each outcome longitudinally, observed changes may be potentially confounded by variability in MRI acquisition parameters between scans. In order to accurately model longitudinal change, the acquisition parameters should thus be considered in statistical models. In this paper, several models for including protocol as well as individual MRI acquisition parameters in linear mixed models were compared using a large dataset of 3453 longitudinal MRI scans from 1341 subjects enrolled in the CLIMB study, and model fit indices were compared across the models. The model that best explained the variance in BPF data was a random intercept and random slope with protocol specific residual variance along with the following fixed-effects: baseline age, baseline disease duration, protocol and study time. The model that best explained the variance in T2LV was a random intercept and random slope along with the following fixed-effects: baseline age, baseline disease duration, protocol and study time. In light of these findings, future studies pertaining to BPF and T2LV outcomes should carefully account for the protocol factors within longitudinal models to ensure that the disease trajectory of MS subjects can be assessed more accurately.
Published Version: doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2015.06.009
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4506959/pdf/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:17820803
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters