The Uneasy Case for Favoring Long-Term Shareholders
View/ Open
Author
Published Version
http://www.yalelawjournal.org/pdf/e.1554.Fried.1627_diuw1qu2.pdfhttp://www.law.harvard.edu/programs/olin_center/papers/pdf/Fried_795.pdf
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Jesse M. Fried, The Uneasy Case for Favoring Long-Term Shareholders (Harvard John M. Olin Discussion Paper Series Discussion Paper No. 795, Nov. 2014, 124 Yale L.J. 1554 (2015)).Abstract
This paper challenges a persistent and pervasive view in corporate law and corporate governance: that a firm’s managers should favor long-term shareholders over short-term shareholders, and maximize long-term shareholders’ returns rather than the short-term stock price. Underlying this view is a strongly-held intuition that taking steps to increase long-term shareholder returns will generate a larger economic pie over time. But this intuition, I show, is flawed. Long-term shareholders, like short-term shareholders, can benefit from managers destroying value — even when the firm’s only residual claimants are its shareholders. Indeed, managers serving long-term shareholders may well destroy more value than managers serving short-term shareholders. Favoring the interests of long-term shareholders could thus reduce, rather than increase, the value generated by a firm over timeOther Sources
http://ssrn.com/abstract=2227080Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAACitable link to this page
http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:17985223
Collections
- HLS Scholarly Articles [1910]
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)