The effect of SUV discretization in quantitative FDG-PET Radiomics: the need for standardized methodology in tumor texture analysis

DSpace/Manakin Repository

The effect of SUV discretization in quantitative FDG-PET Radiomics: the need for standardized methodology in tumor texture analysis

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: The effect of SUV discretization in quantitative FDG-PET Radiomics: the need for standardized methodology in tumor texture analysis
Author: Leijenaar, Ralph T.H.; Nalbantov, Georgi; Carvalho, Sara; van Elmpt, Wouter J.C.; Troost, Esther G.C.; Boellaard, Ronald; Aerts, Hugo J.W.L; Gillies, Robert J.; Lambin, Philippe

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Leijenaar, Ralph T.H., Georgi Nalbantov, Sara Carvalho, Wouter J.C. van Elmpt, Esther G.C. Troost, Ronald Boellaard, Hugo J.W.L Aerts, Robert J. Gillies, and Philippe Lambin. 2015. “The effect of SUV discretization in quantitative FDG-PET Radiomics: the need for standardized methodology in tumor texture analysis.” Scientific Reports 5 (1): 11075. doi:10.1038/srep11075. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep11075.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: FDG-PET-derived textural features describing intra-tumor heterogeneity are increasingly investigated as imaging biomarkers. As part of the process of quantifying heterogeneity, image intensities (SUVs) are typically resampled into a reduced number of discrete bins. We focused on the implications of the manner in which this discretization is implemented. Two methods were evaluated: (1) RD, dividing the SUV range into D equally spaced bins, where the intensity resolution (i.e. bin size) varies per image; and (2) RB, maintaining a constant intensity resolution B. Clinical feasibility was assessed on 35 lung cancer patients, imaged before and in the second week of radiotherapy. Forty-four textural features were determined for different D and B for both imaging time points. Feature values depended on the intensity resolution and out of both assessed methods, RB was shown to allow for a meaningful inter- and intra-patient comparison of feature values. Overall, patients ranked differently according to feature values–which was used as a surrogate for textural feature interpretation–between both discretization methods. Our study shows that the manner of SUV discretization has a crucial effect on the resulting textural features and the interpretation thereof, emphasizing the importance of standardized methodology in tumor texture analysis.
Published Version: doi:10.1038/srep11075
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4525145/pdf/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:21462507
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters