Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAgha, Riazen_US
dc.contributor.authorFowler, Alexander Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorLee, Seon-Youngen_US
dc.contributor.authorGundogan, Buketen_US
dc.contributor.authorWhitehurst, Katharineen_US
dc.contributor.authorSagoo, Hakiranen_US
dc.contributor.authorJeong, Kyung Jin Leeen_US
dc.contributor.authorAltman, Douglas Gen_US
dc.contributor.authorOrgill, Dennis Pen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-03T15:58:17Z
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.citationAgha, Riaz, Alexander J Fowler, Seon-Young Lee, Buket Gundogan, Katharine Whitehurst, Hakiran Sagoo, Kyung Jin Lee Jeong, Douglas G Altman, and Dennis P Orgill. 2015. “A systematic review protocol for reporting deficiencies within surgical case series.” BMJ Open 5 (10): e008007. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008007.en
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055en
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:23474008
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Case series are an important and common study type in surgical literature. There is evidence that key data are excluded from published case series, and currently no reporting guideline exists for case series. There is, therefore, the potential to change practices and improve the reporting of case series. Reporting guidelines have been shown to be efficacious in raising the bar for reporting quality. We present our protocol for the first stage of guideline development—a systematic review of previously identified deficiencies in how surgical case series are reported. Methods and analysis Electronic searches will be conducted on MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Methods Register, Science Citation Index and Conference Proceedings Citation Index, from the start of indexing until 5 November 2014. The electronic search strategy was developed with an information specialist. Two independent researchers will identify articles for inclusion, specifically those that describe reporting deficiencies within surgical case series. Data will be extracted to specifically focus on the deficiencies of reporting. These will be categorised according to their type, and other identified issues will also be presented. Data will be presented with descriptive statistics to determine frequently missing types of data, and the commonest reporting issues tabulated. Ethics and dissemination The authors hope to disseminate the findings as widely as possible, irrespective of results, as these will add to the wider corpora of information on this subject. The systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and will be presented at a wide range of national and international conferences. Ultimately, this will inform a Delphi process for the development of a surgical case series reporting guideline. Protocol registration CRD42015016145.en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen
dc.relation.isversionofdoi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008007en
dc.relation.hasversionhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4606443/pdf/en
dash.licenseLAAen_US
dc.subjectProtocolen
dc.subjectSURGERYen
dc.subjectQUALITATIVE RESEARCHen
dc.titleA systematic review protocol for reporting deficiencies within surgical case seriesen
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.description.versionVersion of Recorden
dc.relation.journalBMJ Openen
dash.depositing.authorOrgill, Dennis Pen_US
dc.date.available2015-11-03T15:58:17Z
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008007*
dash.contributor.affiliatedOrgill, Dennis


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record