Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMurnane, Richard J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLiebowitz, Daviden_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-10T14:59:25Z
dc.date.created2015-11en_US
dc.date.issued2015-07-24en_US
dc.date.submitted2015en_US
dc.identifier.citationLiebowitz, David. 2015. Ending to What End? The Impact of the Termination of Court Desegregation Orders on Patterns of Residential Choice and High-School Completion. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard Graduate School of Education.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:23519637
dc.description.abstractThe essays in this thesis examine the impact of the termination of court desegregation orders on patterns of residential choice and high-school completion. I do this by first examining decisions individual households make about where to live in the aftermath of a change in student-assignment policy using evidence from a single school district. Then, I generalize and assess trends in patterns of residential segregation and high-school dropout rates in a national study. In the first essay, my co-author and I examine whether the legal decision to end race-conscious student assignment policies in the Charlotte-Mecklenburg school district increased the probability that families with children enrolled in the district would move to neighborhoods with a greater proportion of student residents of the same race as their own children. We make use of a natural policy experiment—a judicial decision to end court-ordered busing—to estimate the causal impacts of this policy shift on household residential decisions. We find that, for those who moved, the legal decision made white families with children in the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools substantially more likely than they were during desegregation to move to a neighborhood with a greater proportion of white residents than their own neighborhood. In the second essay, I assess the impacts of the end of court desegregation orders on a comprehensive national sample of districts under court order in 1991. In a series of analyses, I conclude that the release of these districts from court desegregation orders increased the rates of black-white and, even more conclusively, Hispanic-white residential segregation. Furthermore, the declaration of districts as unitary increased rates of 16-19 year-old school dropouts in these districts by three to seven percentage points for Hispanics, one to two percentage points for blacks, and almost four percentage points for blacks living in school districts outside the South. Taken together, these findings suggest that barring the use of race in the assignment of students to schools has deleterious effects on black and Hispanic students and the communities in which they reside.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dash.licenseLAAen_US
dc.subjectEducation, Generalen_US
dc.subjectEducation, Administrationen_US
dc.subjectEconomics, Laboren_US
dc.titleEnding to What End? The Impact of the Termination of Court Desegregation Orders on Patterns of Residential Choice and High-School Completionen_US
dc.typeThesis or Dissertationen_US
dash.depositing.authorLiebowitz, Daviden_US
dc.date.available2015-11-10T14:59:25Z
thesis.degree.date2015en_US
thesis.degree.grantorHarvard Graduate School of Educationen_US
thesis.degree.levelDoctoralen_US
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Education (Ed.D.)en_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberWillett, John B.en_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberWest, Martin R.en_US
dc.type.materialtexten_US
dash.identifier.vireohttp://etds.lib.harvard.edu/gse/admin/view/87en_US
dc.description.keywordseducation policy; desegregation; unitary status; residential segregation; dropout; high-school completionen_US
dash.author.emaildliebowitz@gmail.comen_US
dash.identifier.drsurn-3:HUL.DRS.OBJECT:25123413en_US
dash.contributor.affiliatedLiebowitz, David


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record