Ingenium: Engaging Novice Students with Latin Grammar

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Ingenium: Engaging Novice Students with Latin Grammar

Citable link to this page


Title: Ingenium: Engaging Novice Students with Latin Grammar
Author: Zhou, Sharon; Livingston, Ivy; Schiefsky, Mark John; Shieber, Stuart Merrill ORCID  0000-0002-7733-8195 ; Gajos, Krzysztof Z

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Zhou, Sharon, Ivy J. Livingston, Mark Schiefsky, Stuart M. Shieber, and Krzysztof Z. Gajos. Ingenium: Engaging Novice Students with Latin Grammar. Proceedings of the 34th Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16), San Jose, CA, May 7-12, 2016.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Reading Latin poses many difficulties for English speakers, because they are accustomed to relying on word order to determine the roles of words in a sentence. In Latin, the grammatical form of a word, and not its position, is responsible for determining the word’s function in a sentence. It has
proven challenging to develop pedagogical techniques that successfully draw students’ attention to the grammar of Latin and that students find engaging enough to use. Building on some of the most promising prior work in Latin instruction— the Michigan Latin approach—and on the insights underlying block-based programming languages used to teach children the basics of computer science, we developed Ingenium.
Ingenium uses abstract puzzle blocks to communicate grammatical concepts. Engaging students in grammatical reflection, Ingenium succeeds when students are able to effectively decipher the meaning of Latin sentences. We adapted Ingenium to be used for two standard classroom activities: sentence translations and fill-in-the-blank exercises. We evaluated Ingenium with 67 novice Latin students in universities across the United States. When using Ingenium, participants opted to perform more optional exercises, completed translation exercises with significantly fewer errors related to word order and errors overall, as well as reported higher levels of engagement and attention to grammar than when using a traditional text-based interface.
Published Version: 10.1145/2858036.2858239
Other Sources:
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at
Citable link to this page:
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)


Search DASH

Advanced Search