Analyzing historical trends in breast cancer biomarker expression: a feasibility study (1947–2009)

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Analyzing historical trends in breast cancer biomarker expression: a feasibility study (1947–2009)

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: Analyzing historical trends in breast cancer biomarker expression: a feasibility study (1947–2009)
Author: Krieger, Nancy; Habel, Laurel A; Waterman, Pamela D; Shabani, Melina; Ellison-Loschmann, Lis; Achacoso, Ninah S; Acton, Luana; Schnitt, Stuart J

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Krieger, Nancy, Laurel A Habel, Pamela D Waterman, Melina Shabani, Lis Ellison-Loschmann, Ninah S Achacoso, Luana Acton, and Stuart J Schnitt. 2016. “Analyzing historical trends in breast cancer biomarker expression: a feasibility study (1947–2009).” NPJ breast cancer 1 (1): 15016. doi:10.1038/npjbcancer.2015.16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npjbcancer.2015.16.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Determining long-term trends in tumor biomarker expression is essential for understanding aspects of tumor biology amenable to change. Limiting the availability of such data, currently used assays for biomarkers are relatively new. For example, assays for the estrogen receptor (ER), which are the oldest, extend back only to the 1970s. METHODS To extend scant knowledge about the feasibility of obtaining long-term data on tumor biomarkers, we randomly selected 60 breast cancer cases (10 per decade) diagnosed between 1947–2009 among women members of the Kaiser Permanente Northern California health plan to obtain and analyze their formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor specimens. For each tumor specimen, we created duplicate tissue microarrays for analysis. RESULTS We located tumor blocks and pathology reports for 50 of the 60 cases (83%), from which we randomly sampled 5 cases per decade for biomarker analysis (n = 30). All 30 cases displayed excellent morphology and exhibited biomarkers compatible with histologic type and grade. Test–retest reliability was also excellent: 100% for ER; 97% for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and epidermal growth factor receptor; 93% for progesterone receptor and cytokeratin 5/6; and 90% for Ki67 and molecular phenotype; the kappa statistic was excellent (>0.9) for 4 of the 7 biomarkers, strong (0.6–0.8) for 2, and fair for only 1 (owing to low prevalence). CONCLUSIONS These results indicate immunostaining for biomarkers commonly used to evaluate breast cancer biology and assign surrogate molecular phenotypes can reliably be employed on archival FFPE specimens up to 60 years old.
Published Version: doi:10.1038/npjbcancer.2015.16
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4721558/pdf/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:24984044
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters