Ideological Congruence and Citizen Satisfaction: Evidence from 25 Advanced Democracies

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Ideological Congruence and Citizen Satisfaction: Evidence from 25 Advanced Democracies

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: Ideological Congruence and Citizen Satisfaction: Evidence from 25 Advanced Democracies
Author: Mayne, Quinton; Hakhverdian, Armen

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Mayne, Quinton and Armen Hakhverdian. 2016. Ideological Congruence and Citizen Satisfaction: Evidence from 25 Advanced Democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 2016 (Forthcoming)
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Ideological congruence is an important and popular measure of the quality of political representation. The closer the match between the preferences of the public and those of elected elites, the better representative democracy is thought to function. Relatively little attention has been paid however to the effects of ideological congruence on political judgement. We address this gap by examining whether citizens use egocentric or sociotropic judgments of congruence to evaluate democratic performance. Using a variety of congruence measures, we find that citizens are unmoved by sociotropic congruence; however, our analyses provide clear evidence that egocentric congruence boosts citizen satisfaction, especially among political sophisticates. We conclude by discussing the implications of these findings for the study of ideological congruence and political representation.
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#OAP
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:25302405
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters