Thermal reactionomes reveal divergent responses to thermal extremes in warm and cool-climate ant species

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Thermal reactionomes reveal divergent responses to thermal extremes in warm and cool-climate ant species

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: Thermal reactionomes reveal divergent responses to thermal extremes in warm and cool-climate ant species
Author: Stanton-Geddes, John; Nguyen, Andrew; Chick, Lacy; Vincent, James; Vangala, Mahesh; Dunn, Robert R.; Ellison, Aaron M.; Sanders, Nathan J.; Gotelli, Nicholas J.; Cahan, Sara Helms

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Stanton-Geddes, John, Andrew Nguyen, Lacy Chick, James Vincent, Mahesh Vangala, Robert R. Dunn, Aaron M. Ellison, Nathan J. Sanders, Nicholas J. Gotelli, and Sara Helms Cahan. 2016. “Thermal Reactionomes Reveal Divergent Responses to Thermal Extremes in Warm and Cool-Climate Ant Species.” BMC Genomics 17 (1) (March 2). doi:10.1186/s12864-016-2466-z.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Background: The distributions of species and their responses to climate change are in part determined by their thermal tolerances. However, little is known about how thermal tolerance evolves. To test whether evolutionary extension of thermal limits is accomplished through enhanced cellular stress response (enhanced response), constitutively elevated expression of protective genes (genetic assimilation) or a shift from damage resistance to passive mechanisms of thermal stability (tolerance), we conducted an analysis of the reactionome: the reaction norm for all genes in an organism’s transcriptome measured across an experimental gradient. We characterized thermal reactionomes of two common ant species in the eastern U.S, the northern cool-climate Aphaenogaster picea and the southern warm-climate Aphaenogaster carolinensis, across 12 temperatures that spanned their entire thermal breadth. Results: We found that at least 2% of all genes changed expression with temperature. The majority of upregulation was specific to exposure to low temperatures. The cool-adapted A. picea induced expression of more genes in response to extreme temperatures than did A. carolinensis, consistent with the enhanced response hypothesis. In contrast, under high temperatures the warm-adapted A. carolinensis downregulated many of the genes upregulated in A. picea, and required more extreme temperatures to induce down-regulation in gene expression, consistent with the tolerance hypothesis. We found no evidence for a trade-off between constitutive and inducible gene expression as predicted by the genetic assimilation hypothesis. Conclusions: These results suggest that increases in upper thermal limits may require an evolutionary shift in response mechanism away from damage repair toward tolerance and prevention.
Published Version: doi:10.1186/s12864-016-2466-z
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4776372/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:25872795
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters