Points to consider for prioritizing clinical genetic testing services: a European consensus process oriented at accountability for reasonableness

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Points to consider for prioritizing clinical genetic testing services: a European consensus process oriented at accountability for reasonableness

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: Points to consider for prioritizing clinical genetic testing services: a European consensus process oriented at accountability for reasonableness
Author: Severin, Franziska; Borry, Pascal; Cornel, Martina C; Daniels, Norman; Fellmann, Florence; Victoria Hodgson, Shirley; Howard, Heidi C; John, Jürgen; Kääriäinen, Helena; Kayserili, Hülya; Kent, Alastair; Koerber, Florian; Kristoffersson, Ulf; Kroese, Mark; Lewis, Celine; Marckmann, Georg; Meyer, Peter; Pfeufer, Arne; Schmidtke, Jörg; Skirton, Heather; Tranebjærg, Lisbeth; Rogowski, Wolf H

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Severin, F., P. Borry, M. C. Cornel, N. Daniels, F. Fellmann, S. Victoria Hodgson, H. C. Howard, et al. 2015. “Points to consider for prioritizing clinical genetic testing services: a European consensus process oriented at accountability for reasonableness.” European Journal of Human Genetics 23 (6): 729-735. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2014.190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2014.190.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Given the cost constraints of the European health-care systems, criteria are needed to decide which genetic services to fund from the public budgets, if not all can be covered. To ensure that high-priority services are available equitably within and across the European countries, a shared set of prioritization criteria would be desirable. A decision process following the accountability for reasonableness framework was undertaken, including a multidisciplinary EuroGentest/PPPC-ESHG workshop to develop shared prioritization criteria. Resources are currently too limited to fund all the beneficial genetic testing services available in the next decade. Ethically and economically reflected prioritization criteria are needed. Prioritization should be based on considerations of medical benefit, health need and costs. Medical benefit includes evidence of benefit in terms of clinical benefit, benefit of information for important life decisions, benefit for other people apart from the person tested and the patient-specific likelihood of being affected by the condition tested for. It may be subject to a finite time window. Health need includes the severity of the condition tested for and its progression at the time of testing. Further discussion and better evidence is needed before clearly defined recommendations can be made or a prioritization algorithm proposed. To our knowledge, this is the first time a clinical society has initiated a decision process about health-care prioritization on a European level, following the principles of accountability for reasonableness. We provide points to consider to stimulate this debate across the EU and to serve as a reference for improving patient management.
Published Version: doi:10.1038/ejhg.2014.190
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4795066/pdf/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:26318720
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters