Don’t panic: Interpretation bias is predictive of new onsets of panic disorder
woud et al. 2014 jad panic disorder.pdf (241.7Kb)
Access StatusFull text of the requested work is not available in DASH at this time ("restricted access"). For more information on restricted deposits, see our FAQ.
Woud, Marcella L.
Zhang, Xiao Chi
Becker, Eni S.
MetadataShow full item record
CitationWoud, Marcella L., Xiao Chi Zhang, Eni S. Becker, Richard J. McNally, and Jürgen Margraf. 2014. “Don’t Panic: Interpretation Bias Is Predictive of New Onsets of Panic Disorder.” Journal of Anxiety Disorders 28 (1) (January): 83–87. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2013.11.008.
AbstractPsychological models of panic disorder postulate that interpretation of ambiguous material as threatening is an important maintaining factor for the disorder. However, demonstrations of whether such a bias predicts onset of panic disorder are missing. In the present study, we used data from the Dresden Prediction Study, in which a epidemiologic sample of young German women was tested at two time points approximately 17 months apart, allowing the study of biased interpretation as a potential risk factor. At time point one, participants completed an Interpretation Questionnaire including two types of ambiguous scenarios: panic-related and general threat-related. Analyses revealed that a panic-related interpretation bias predicted onset of panic disorder, even after controlling for two established risk factors: anxiety sensitivity and fear of bodily sensations. This is the first prospective study demonstrating the incremental validity of interpretation bias as a predictor of panic disorder onset.
Citable link to this pagehttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:26370198
- FAS Scholarly Articles 
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)