Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVerba, Sidney
dc.date.accessioned2009-03-02T02:25:58Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.citationVerba, Sidney. 2006. Fairness, equality, and democracy: three big words. Social Research: An International Quarterly of Social Sciences 73(2): 499-540.en
dc.identifier.issn0037-783Xen
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:2640592
dc.description.abstractIn this paper I will focus on what might be meant by fairness in a democratic regime. There may be more general fairness criteria applicable to any political system, democratic or authoritarian, but fairness in relation to political decisions is especially central in a democracy. Democratic regimes are supposed to be run by the citizenry, or at least the citizenry ought to be the ultimate authority. Democracies depend on legitimacy to function effectively; only when a regime is considered legitimate can it rule by consent rather than coercion. Democratic regimes cannot rely on coercion to govern and long remain democratic. Thus, public acceptance is important. This also explains why the public determination of what is fair, both as a matter of principle and in the evaluation of particular actions of particular governments, is central in democratic rule.en
dc.description.sponsorshipGovernmenten
dc.publisherNew School for Social Researchen
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://socialresearch.metapress.com/link.asp?id=l1365756gg111r47en
dash.licenseLAA
dc.titleFairness, Equality, and Democracy: Three Big Wordsen
dc.relation.journalSocial Research: An International Quarterly of Social Sciencesen
dash.depositing.authorVerba, Sidney
dash.contributor.affiliatedVerba, Sidney


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record