Socioeconomic rights in constitutional law: Explaining America away

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Socioeconomic rights in constitutional law: Explaining America away

Show simple item record Michelman, Frank 2009-03-02T14:27:39Z
dash.embargo.terms 2010-06-16 2008
dc.identifier.citation Frank I. Michelman, Socioeconomic Rights in Constitutional Law: Explaining America Away, 6 Int'l J. Constit. L. 663 (2008). en
dc.identifier.issn 1474-2659 en
dc.identifier.issn 1474-2640 en
dc.description.abstract The apparent absence of a commitment to socioeconomic rights in United States constitutional law gives rise to continuing debate. It is unclear that this omission has any bearing on the actual performance of American governments in the social welfare field. Might there be other reasons for treating the omission as problematic? If so, might the omission nevertheless be explained in terms consistent with the belief that some kind of socioeconomic commitment ideally does belong in the constitutional law of a country like the U.S.? After briefly reviewing the uneasy instrumental case for a constitutionalized socioeconomic commitment, this article suggests why inclusion could be demanded, nonetheless, as a matter of political-moral principle. It then canvasses possible responses to the American case. These include both a possible denial that socioeconomic guarantees are, in fact, lacking from U.S. constitutional law and a possible claim that omitting them is the correct choice for the U.S. as a matter of nonideal political morality. en
dc.language.iso en_US en
dc.publisher Oxford University Press en
dc.relation.isversionof en
dash.license LAA
dc.title Socioeconomic rights in constitutional law: Explaining America away en
dc.relation.journal International Journal of Constitutional Law en Michelman, Frank 2010-06-16T07:30:22Z

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
michelman_socioeconomic.pdf 130.0Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Search DASH

Advanced Search