MR-arthrography and CT-arthrography in sports-related glenolabral injuries: a matched descriptive illustration
View/ Open
Author
Jarraya, Mohamed
Roemer, Frank W.
Landreau, Philippe
D’Hooghe, Pieter
Guermazi, Ali
Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-015-0462-5Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Jarraya, Mohamed, Frank W. Roemer, Heather I. Gale, Philippe Landreau, Pieter D’Hooghe, and Ali Guermazi. 2016. “MR-arthrography and CT-arthrography in sports-related glenolabral injuries: a matched descriptive illustration.” Insights into Imaging 7 (2): 167-177. doi:10.1007/s13244-015-0462-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-015-0462-5.Abstract
The combination of a large range of motion and insufficient bony stabilization makes the glenohumeral joint susceptible to injuries including dislocation in young athletes. Magnetic resonance arthrography (MR-arthrography) and computed tomography arthrography (CT-arthrography) play an important role in the preoperative workup of labroligametous injuries. This paper illustrates MR-arthrography and CT-arthrography findings acquired at the same time on the same subjects to illustrate common causes and sequelae of shoulder instability. Teaching Points • MR-arthrography and CT-arthrography are equivalent for SLAP and full-thickness rotator cuff tears. • CT-arthrography is superior in evaluating osseous defects and cartilage surface lesions. • MR-arthrography is superior in evaluating intrasubstance and extra-articular tendinous injuries.Other Sources
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4805613/pdf/Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAACitable link to this page
http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:26859903
Collections
- HMS Scholarly Articles [17922]
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)