Ethical priority setting for universal health coverage: challenges in deciding upon fair distribution of health services

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Ethical priority setting for universal health coverage: challenges in deciding upon fair distribution of health services

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: Ethical priority setting for universal health coverage: challenges in deciding upon fair distribution of health services
Author: Norheim, Ole F.
Citation: Norheim, Ole F. 2016. “Ethical priority setting for universal health coverage: challenges in deciding upon fair distribution of health services.” BMC Medicine 14 (1): 75. doi:10.1186/s12916-016-0624-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-016-0624-4.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Priority setting is inevitable on the path towards universal health coverage. All countries experience a gap between their population’s health needs and what is economically feasible for governments to provide. Can priority setting ever be fair and ethically acceptable? Fairness requires that unmet health needs be addressed, but in a fair order. Three criteria for priority setting are widely accepted among ethicists: cost-effectiveness, priority to the worse-off, and financial risk protection. Thus, a fair health system will expand coverage for cost-effective services and give extra priority to those benefiting the worse-off, whilst at the same time providing high financial risk protection. It is considered unacceptable to treat people differently according to their gender, race, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, social status, or place of residence. Inequalities in health outcomes associated with such personal characteristics are therefore unfair and should be minimized. This commentary also discusses a third group of contested criteria, including rare diseases, small health benefits, age, and personal responsibility for health, subsequently rejecting them. In conclusion, countries need to agree on criteria and establish transparent and fair priority setting processes.
Published Version: doi:10.1186/s12916-016-0624-4
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4864904/pdf/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:27320402
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters