Analysis of Multiple-cycle Data From Couples Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Analysis of Multiple-cycle Data From Couples Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: Analysis of Multiple-cycle Data From Couples Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization
Author: Missmer, Stacey Ann; Pearson, Kimberly Hope; Ryan, Louise Marie; Meeker, John D.; Cramer, Daniel William; Hauser, Russ B.

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Missmer, Stacey A., Kimberly R. Pearson, Louise M. Ryan, John D. Meeker, Daniel W. Cramer, and Russ Hauser. 2011. “Analysis of Multiple-Cycle Data From Couples Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization.” Epidemiology 22 (4) (July): 497–504. doi:10.1097/ede.0b013e31821b5351.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: The number of in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles in the U.S. increased from fewer than 46,000 in 1995 to more than 120,000 in 2005. IVF and other assisted reproductive technology (ART) data are routinely collected and used to identify outcome predictors. However, researchers do not always make full use of the data due to its complexity. Design approaches have included restriction to first-cycle attempts only, which reduces power and identifies effects only of those factors associated with initial success. Many statistical techniques have been utilized or proposed for analysis of IVF data, ranging from simple t-tests to sophisticated models designed specifically for IVF. We apply several of these methods to data from a prospective cohort of 2687 couples undergoing ART from 1994 through 2003. Results across methods are compared and the appropriateness of the various methods is discussed with the intent to illustrate methodologic validity. We observed a remarkable similarity of coefficient estimates across models. However, each method for dealing with multiple cycle data relies on assumptions that may or may not be expected to hold in a given IVF study. The robustness and reported magnitude of effect for individual predictors of IVF success may be inflated or attenuated due to violation of statistical assumptions, and should always be critically interpreted. Given that risk factors associated with IVF success may also advance our understanding of the physiologic processes underlying conception, implantation, and gestation, the application of valid methods to these complex data is critical.
Published Version: doi:10.1097/EDE.0b013e31821b5351
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3402159/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:27336525
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters