Regaining Perspective: Constitutional Criminal Adjudication in the U.S. Supreme Court

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Regaining Perspective: Constitutional Criminal Adjudication in the U.S. Supreme Court

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: Regaining Perspective: Constitutional Criminal Adjudication in the U.S. Supreme Court
Author: Crespo, Andrew Manuel
Citation: Andrew Manuel Crespo, Regaining Perspective: Constitutional Criminal Adjudication in the U.S. Supreme Court, 100 Minn. L. Rev. 1985 (2016).
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Anthony Amsterdam’s seminal Perspectives on the Fourth Amendment opens with a discussion of the various institutional “vexations” that confront the Supreme Court when it works to interpret and implement the Fourth Amendment.  Commemorating the centennial volume of the Review that first published that legal classic, this Article offers a renewed assessment of the institutional vexations confronting the Court in this arena, tracing three new institutional developments that have emerged over the four decades that have followed in the Perspectives’ wake. Those new developments are: (1) the sharp shift in the composition of the Supreme Court toward Justices with prior professional experience as prosecutors; (2) the rise of a markedly imbalanced Supreme Court Bar, in which criminal defendants not only lack the expert representation common to litigants in civil cases, but are also dramatically outmatched by the expertise of opposing government counsel; and (3) the rise of “constitutional-claim bargaining,” a process in which prosecutors exercise their considerable charging leverage to shape the pipeline of constitutional issues that are exposed to the light of litigation in the first instance, and that are thus able to make their way to the Supreme Court for review.  This Article examines each of these new developments in turn. In so doing, it identifies specific steps that the Supreme Court itself could take to mitigate the potentially ill effects that these new vexations might entail—steps by which the Court could begin to regain a more balanced institutional perspective of the criminal justice system over which it presides.
Published Version: http://www.minnesotalawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Crespo_Online1.pdf
Other Sources: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2794208
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:27360382
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters