Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBaldwin, Carliss Young
dc.contributor.authorHenkel, Joachim
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-26T15:49:11Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationBaldwin, Carliss Y., and Joachim Henkel. "Modularity and Intellectual Property Protection." Strategic Management Journal 36, no. 11 (November 2015): 1637–1655.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0143-2095en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:27743923
dc.description.abstractModularity is a means of partitioning technical knowledge about a product or process. When state-sanctioned intellectual property (IP) rights are ineffective or costly to enforce, modularity can be used to hide information and thus protect IP. We investigate the impact of modularity on IP protection by formally modeling the threat of expropriation by agents. The principal has three options to address this threat: trust, licensing, and paying agents to stay loyal. We show how the principal can influence the value of these options by modularizing the system and by hiring clans of agents, thus exploiting relationships among them. Extensions address screening and signaling in hiring, the effects of an imperfect legal system, and social norms of fairness. We illustrate our arguments with examples from practice.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/smj.2303/fullen_US
dash.licenseLAA
dc.subjectintellectual propertyen_US
dc.titleModularity and Intellectual Property Protectionen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.description.versionVersion of Recorden_US
dc.relation.journalStrategic Management Journalen_US
dash.depositing.authorBaldwin, Carliss Young
dc.date.available2016-07-26T15:49:11Z
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/smj.2303/full*
dash.contributor.affiliatedBaldwin, Carliss


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record