Enhancing the Interpretive Reading and Analytical Writing of Mainstreamed English Learners in Secondary School: Results From a Randomized Field Trial Using a Cognitive Strategies Approach
Author
Olson, C. B.
Scarcella, R.
Kramer, J.
Pearson, Matthew
van Dyk, D. A.
Collins, P.
Land, Robert
Published Version
https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212439434Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Olson, Carol B., James S. Kim, Robin Scarcella, Jason Kramer, Matthew Pearson, David A. van Dyk, Penny Collins and Robert E. Land. 2012. Enhancing the Interpretive Reading and Analytical Writing of Mainstreamed English Learners in Secondary School: Results From a Randomized Field Trial Using a Cognitive Strategies Approach. American Educational Research Journal 49, no. 2:323-355.Abstract
In this study, 72 secondary English teachers from the Santa Ana Unified School District were randomly assigned to participate in the Pathway Project, a cognitive strategies approach to teaching interpretive reading and analytical writing, or to a control condition involving typical district training focusing on teaching content from the textbook. Pathway teachers learned how to use an on-demand writing assessment to help mainstreamed English learners understand, interpret, and write analytical essays. In Year 2, treatment effects were replicated on an on-demand writing assessment (d = .67) and showed evidence of transfer to improved performance on a standardized writing test (d = .10). The results underscore the efficacy of a cognitive strategies reading/writing intervention for mainstreamed English learners (ELs) in the secondary grades.Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#OAPCitable link to this page
http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:28552551
Collections
- GSE Scholarly Articles [365]
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)