Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGasser, Urs
dc.contributor.authorGertner, Nancy
dc.contributor.authorGoldsmith, Jack L.
dc.contributor.authorLandau, Susan
dc.contributor.authorNye, Joseph S.
dc.contributor.authorO'Brien, David
dc.contributor.authorOlsen, Matthew G.
dc.contributor.authorRenan, Daphna
dc.contributor.authorSanchez, Julian
dc.contributor.authorSchneider, Bruce
dc.contributor.authorSchwartzol, Larry
dc.contributor.authorZittrain, Jonathan L.
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-26T17:14:48Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationZittrain, Jonathan L., Matthew G. Olsen, David O'Brien, and Bruce Schneier. 2016. "Don't Panic: Making Progress on the “Going Dark” Debate." Berkman Center Research Publication 2016-1.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:28552576
dc.description.abstractJust over a year ago, with support from the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, the Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University convened a diverse group of security and policy experts from academia, civil society, and the U.S. intelligence community to begin to work through some of the particularly vexing and enduring problems of surveillance and cybersecurity. The group came together understanding that there has been no shortage of debate. Our goals were to foster a straightforward, non-talking-point exchange among people who do not normally have a chance to engage with each other and then to contribute in meaningful and concrete ways to the discourse on these issues. A public debate unfolded alongside our meetings: the claims and questions around the government finding a landscape that is “going dark” due to new forms of encryption introduced into mainstream consumer products and services by the companies who offer them. We have sought to distill our conversations and some conclusions in this report. The participants in our group who have signed on to the report, as listed on the following page, endorse “the general viewpoints and judgments reached by the group, though not necessarily every finding and recommendation.” In addition to endorsing the report, some signatories elected to individually write brief statements, which appear in Appendix A of the report and also as individual posts on Lawfareblog.com, written by Jonathan Zittrain, Bruce Schneier, and Susan Landau. Our participants who are currently employed full-time by government agencies are precluded from signing on because of their employment, and nothing can or should be inferred about their views from the contents of the report. We simply thank them for contributing to the group discussions.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherBerkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law Schoolen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://cyber.harvard.edu/pubrelease/dont-panic/en_US
dash.licenseLAA
dc.titleDon't Panic: Making Progress on the "Going Dark" Debateen_US
dc.typeResearch Paper or Reporten_US
dc.description.versionVersion of Recorden_US
dc.relation.journalBerkman Center Research Publicationen_US
dc.date.available2016-09-26T17:14:48Z
dash.authorsorderedfalse
dash.contributor.affiliatedNye, Joseph
dash.contributor.affiliatedO'Brien, David
dash.contributor.affiliatedGoldsmith, Jack
dash.contributor.affiliatedRenan, Daphna
dash.contributor.affiliatedGertner, Nancy
dash.contributor.affiliatedOlsen, Matthew
dash.contributor.affiliatedZittrain, Jonathan
dash.contributor.affiliatedGasser, Urs


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record