Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKim, James Sangil
dc.contributor.authorCapotosto, Lauren
dc.contributor.authorHartry, Ardice
dc.contributor.authorFitzgerald, Robert
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-05T15:51:19Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationKim, James. S., Lauren C. Capotosto, Ardice Hartry, and Robert Fitzgerald. 2011. Can a Mixed-Method Literacy Intervention Improve the Reading Achievement of Low-Performing Elementary School Students in an After-School Program?: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial of READ 180 Enterprise. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 33, no.2: 183–201.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0162-3737en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:28979949
dc.description.abstractThis article describes an independent evaluation of the READ 180 Enterprise intervention designed by Scholastic, Inc. Despite widespread use of the program with upper elementary through high school students, there is limited empirical evidence to support its effectiveness. In this randomized controlled trial involving 312 students enrolled in an after-school program, we generated intention-to-treat (ITT) and treatment-on-the-treated (TOT) estimates of the program’s impact on several literacy outcomes of fourth, fifth, and sixth graders reading below proficiency on a state assessment at baseline. READ 180 Enterprise students outperformed control group students on vocabulary (d = .23) and reading comprehension (d = .32), but not on spelling and oral reading fluency. We interpret the findings in light of the theory of instruction underpinning the READ 180 Enterprise intervention.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Educational Research Association (AERA)en_US
dc.relation.isversionofdoi:10.3102/0162373711399148en_US
dash.licenseOAP
dc.titleCan a Mixed-Method Literacy Intervention Improve the Reading Achievement of Low-Performing Elementary School Students in an After-School Program?: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial of READ 180 Enterpriseen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.description.versionAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.relation.journalEducational Evaluation and Policy Analysisen_US
dash.depositing.authorKim, James Sangil
dc.date.available2016-10-05T15:51:19Z
dc.identifier.doi10.3102/0162373711399148*
dash.contributor.affiliatedCapotosto, Lauren
dash.contributor.affiliatedKim, James


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record