Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBeck, Andrew H
dc.contributor.authorKnoblauch, Nicholas W.
dc.contributor.authorHefti, Marco
dc.contributor.authorKaplan, Jennifer
dc.contributor.authorSchnitt, Stuart Jay
dc.contributor.authorCulhane, Aedin
dc.contributor.authorSchroeder, Markus S.
dc.contributor.authorRisch, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorQuackenbush, John
dc.contributor.authorHaibe-Kains, Benjamin
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-13T19:09:00Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationBeck, Andrew H., Nicholas W. Knoblauch, Marco M. Hefti, Jennifer Kaplan, Stuart J. Schnitt, Aedin C. Culhane, Markus S. Schroeder, Thomas Risch, John Quackenbush, and Benjamin Haibe-Kains. 2013. “Significance Analysis of Prognostic Signatures.” Edited by Greg Tucker-Kellogg. PLoS Computational Biology 9 (1) (January 24): e1002875. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002875.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1553-7358en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:29004006
dc.description.abstractA major goal in translational cancer research is to identify biological signatures driving cancer progression and metastasis. A common technique applied in genomics research is to cluster patients using gene expression data from a candidate prognostic gene set, and if the resulting clusters show statistically significant outcome stratification, to associate the gene set with prognosis, suggesting its biological and clinical importance. Recent work has questioned the validity of this approach by showing in several breast cancer data sets that ‘‘random’’ gene sets tend to cluster patients into prognostically variable subgroups. This work suggests that new rigorous statistical methods are needed to identify biologically informative prognostic gene sets. To address this problem, we developed Significance Analysis of Prognostic Signatures (SAPS) which integrates standard prognostic tests with a new prognostic significance test based on stratifying patients into prognostic subtypes with random gene sets. SAPS ensures that a significant gene set is not only able to stratify patients into prognostically variable groups, but is also enriched for genes showing strong univariate associations with patient prognosis, and performs significantly better than random gene sets. We use SAPS to perform a large meta-analysis (the largest completed to date) of prognostic pathways in breast and ovarian cancer and their molecular subtypes. Our analyses show that only a small subset of the gene sets found statistically significant using standard measures achieve significance by SAPS. We identify new prognostic signatures in breast and ovarian cancer and their corresponding molecular subtypes, and we show that prognostic signatures in ER negative breast cancer are more similar to prognostic signatures in ovarian cancer than to prognostic signatures in ER positive breast cancer. SAPS is a powerful new method for deriving robust prognostic biological signatures from clinically annotated genomic datasets.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS)en_US
dc.relation.isversionofdoi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002875en_US
dash.licenseLAA
dc.titleSignificance Analysis of Prognostic Signaturesen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.description.versionAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.relation.journalPLoS Comput Biolen_US
dash.depositing.authorCulhane, Aedin
dc.date.available2016-10-13T19:09:00Z
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002875*
dash.contributor.affiliatedHefti, Marco
dash.contributor.affiliatedKaplan, Jennifer
dash.contributor.affiliatedBeck, Andrew
dash.contributor.affiliatedCulhane, Aedin
dash.contributor.affiliatedHaibe-Kains, Benjamin
dash.contributor.affiliatedSchnitt, Stuart
dash.contributor.affiliatedQuackenbush, John
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2702-5879


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record