The feasibility of using natural language processing to extract clinical information from breast pathology reports

DSpace/Manakin Repository

The feasibility of using natural language processing to extract clinical information from breast pathology reports

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: The feasibility of using natural language processing to extract clinical information from breast pathology reports
Author: Hughes, Kevin S.; Buckley, Julliette M; Coopey, Suzanne; Sharko, John; Polubriaginof, Fernanda; Drohan, Brian; Belli, Ahmet K; Kim, Elizabeth M. H.; Garber, Judy Ellen; Smith, Barbara Lynn; Gadd, Michele Annette; Specht, Michelle Connolly; Roche, Constance A; Gudewicz, Thomas Michael

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Hughes, KevinS, JullietteM Buckley, SuzanneB Coopey, John Sharko, Fernanda Polubriaginof, Brian Drohan, AhmetK Belli, et al. 2012. “The Feasibility of Using Natural Language Processing to Extract Clinical Information from Breast Pathology Reports.” Journal of Pathology Informatics 3 (1): 23. doi:10.4103/2153-3539.97788.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Objective: The opportunity to integrate clinical decision support systems into clinical practice is limited due to the lack of structured, machine readable data in the current format of the electronic health record. Natural language processing has been designed to convert free text into machine readable data. The aim of the current study was to ascertain the feasibility of using natural language processing to extract clinical information from >76,000 breast pathology reports. Approach and Procedure: Breast pathology reports from three institutions were analyzed using natural language processing software (Clearforest, Waltham, MA) to extract information on a variety of pathologic diagnoses of interest. Data tables were created from the extracted information according to date of surgery, side of surgery, and medical record number. The variety of ways in which each diagnosis could be represented was recorded, as a means of demonstrating the complexity of machine interpretation of free text. Results: There was widespread variation in how pathologists reported common pathologic diagnoses. We report, for example, 124 ways of saying invasive ductal carcinoma and 95 ways of saying invasive lobular carcinoma. There were >4000 ways of saying invasive ductal carcinoma was not present. Natural language processor sensitivity and specificity were 99.1% and 96.5% when compared to expert human coders. Conclusion: We have demonstrated how a large body of free text medical information such as seen in breast pathology reports, can be converted to a machine readable format using natural language processing, and described the inherent complexities of the task.
Published Version: doi:10.4103/2153-3539.97788
Other Sources: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3424662/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:29061630
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters