The Discrepancy between Patient and Clinician Reported Function in Extremity Bone Metastases

DSpace/Manakin Repository

The Discrepancy between Patient and Clinician Reported Function in Extremity Bone Metastases

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: The Discrepancy between Patient and Clinician Reported Function in Extremity Bone Metastases
Author: Janssen, Stein J.; van Rein, Eva A. J.; Paulino Pereira, Nuno Rui; Raskin, Kevin A.; Ferrone, Marco L.; Hornicek, Francis J.; Lozano-Calderon, Santiago A.; Schwab, Joseph H.

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Janssen, Stein J., Eva A. J. van Rein, Nuno Rui Paulino Pereira, Kevin A. Raskin, Marco L. Ferrone, Francis J. Hornicek, Santiago A. Lozano-Calderon, and Joseph H. Schwab. 2016. “The Discrepancy between Patient and Clinician Reported Function in Extremity Bone Metastases.” Sarcoma 2016 (1): 1014248. doi:10.1155/2016/1014248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1014248.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Background:. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scoring system measures function and is commonly used but criticized because it was developed to be completed by the clinician and not by the patient. We therefore evaluated if there is a difference between patient and clinician reported function using the MSTS score. Methods. 128 patients with bone metastasis of the lower (n = 100) and upper (n = 28) extremity completed the MSTS score. The MSTS score consists of six domains, scored on a 0 to 5 scale and transformed into an overall score ranging from 0 to 100% with a higher score indicating better function. The MSTS score was also derived from clinicians' reports in the medical record. Results. The median age was 63 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 55–71) and the study included 74 (58%) women. We found that the clinicians' MSTS score (median: 65, IQR: 49–83) overestimated the function as compared to the patient perceived score (median: 57, IQR: 40–70) by 8 points (p < 0.001). Conclusion. Clinician reports overestimate function as compared to the patient perceived score. This is important for acknowledging when informing patients about the expected outcome of treatment and for understanding patients' perceptions.
Published Version: doi:10.1155/2016/1014248
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5048023/pdf/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:29408160
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters