Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFaison, Edward K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDeStefano, Stephenen_US
dc.contributor.authorFoster, David R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRapp, Joshua M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCompton, Justin A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-03T23:50:37Z
dc.date.issued2016en_US
dc.identifier.citationFaison, Edward K., Stephen DeStefano, David R. Foster, Joshua M. Rapp, and Justin A. Compton. 2016. “Multiple Browsers Structure Tree Recruitment in Logged Temperate Forests.” PLoS ONE 11 (11): e0166783. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0166783. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166783.en
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203en
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:29739174
dc.description.abstractHistorical extirpations have resulted in depauperate large herbivore assemblages in many northern forests. In eastern North America, most forests are inhabited by a single wild ungulate species, white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), and relationships between deer densities and impacts on forest regeneration are correspondingly well documented. Recent recolonizations by moose (Alces americanus) in northeastern regions complicate established deer density thresholds and predictions of browsing impacts on forest dynamics because size and foraging differences between the two animals suggest a lack of functional redundancy. We asked to what extent low densities of deer + moose would structure forest communities differently from that of low densities of deer in recently logged patch cuts of Massachusetts, USA. In each site, a randomized block with three treatment levels of large herbivores–no-ungulates (full exclosure), deer (partial exclosure), and deer + moose (control) was established. After 6–7 years, deer + moose reduced stem densities and basal area by 2-3-fold, Prunus pensylvanica and Quercus spp. recruitment by 3–6 fold, and species richness by 1.7 species (19%). In contrast, in the partial exclosures, deer had non-significant effects on stem density, basal area, and species composition, but significantly reduced species richness by 2.5 species on average (28%). Deer browsing in the partial exclosure was more selective than deer + moose browsing together, perhaps contributing to the decline in species richness in the former treatment and the lack of additional decline in the latter. Moose used the control plots at roughly the same frequency as deer (as determined by remote camera traps), suggesting that the much larger moose was the dominant browser species in terms of animal biomass in these cuts. A lack of functional redundancy with respect to foraging behavior between sympatric large herbivores may explain combined browsing effects that were both large and complex.en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen
dc.relation.isversionofdoi:10.1371/journal.pone.0166783en
dc.relation.hasversionhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5125606/pdf/en
dash.licenseLAAen_US
dc.subjectBiology and Life Sciencesen
dc.subjectOrganismsen
dc.subjectAnimalsen
dc.subjectVertebratesen
dc.subjectAmniotesen
dc.subjectMammalsen
dc.subjectRuminantsen
dc.subjectDeeren
dc.subjectMooseen
dc.subjectEcologyen
dc.subjectEcosystemsen
dc.subjectForestsen
dc.subjectEcology and Environmental Sciencesen
dc.subjectTerrestrial Environmentsen
dc.subjectPlantsen
dc.subjectTreesen
dc.subjectPlant Ecologyen
dc.subjectPlant-Animal Interactionsen
dc.subjectHerbivoryen
dc.subjectPlant Scienceen
dc.subjectCommunity Ecologyen
dc.subjectTrophic Interactionsen
dc.subjectEcological Metricsen
dc.subjectSpecies Diversityen
dc.subjectTemperate Forestsen
dc.subjectBehavioren
dc.subjectAnimal Behavioren
dc.subjectForagingen
dc.subjectZoologyen
dc.titleMultiple Browsers Structure Tree Recruitment in Logged Temperate Forestsen
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.description.versionVersion of Recorden
dc.relation.journalPLoS ONEen
dash.depositing.authorFoster, David R.en_US
dc.date.available2017-01-03T23:50:37Z
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0166783*
dash.contributor.affiliatedRapp, Joshua
dash.contributor.affiliatedFoster, David


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record