Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLopez-de-Salanes, Florencio
dc.contributor.authorShleifer, Andrei
dc.contributor.authorVishny, Robert
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-08T20:59:15Z
dc.date.issued1997
dc.identifier.citationLopez-de-Silanes, Florencio, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert W Vishny. 1997. Privatization in the United States. Rand Journal of Economics 28, no. 3: 447-471en_US
dc.identifier.issn0741-6261en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:30727606
dc.description.abstractIn the United States, the two principal modes of producing local government services are inhouse provision by government employees and contracting out to private suppliers, also known as privatization. We examine empirically how United States counties choose their mode of providing services. The evidence indicates that state clean-governance laws and state restricting county spending encourage privatization, whereas strong public unions discourage it. The evidence is inconsistent with the view that efficiency considerations along govern the provision mode, and points to the important roles played by political patronage and taxpayer resistance to government spending in the privatization decision.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipEconomicsen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherRANDen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://editorialexpress.com/cgi-bin/rje_online.cgi?action=view&year=1997&issue=aut&page=447&&tid=152740&sc=1UVkp6pten_US
dash.licenseLAA
dc.titlePrivatization in the United Statesen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.description.versionAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.relation.journalRAND Journal of Economicsen_US
dash.depositing.authorShleifer, Andrei
dc.date.available2017-03-08T20:59:15Z
dash.authorsorderedfalse
dash.contributor.affiliatedShleifer, Andrei


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record