Bad Beta, Good Beta

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Bad Beta, Good Beta

Show simple item record Campbell, John Vuolteenaho, Tuomo 2009-06-26T13:19:49Z 2004
dc.identifier.citation Campbell, John Y., and Tuomo Vuolteenaho. 2004. Bad Beta, Good Beta. American Economic Review 94(5): 1249-1275. en
dc.identifier.issn 0002-8282 en
dc.description.abstract This paper explains the size and value "anomalies" in stock returns using an economically motivated two-beta model. We break the beta of a stock with the market portfolio into two components, one reflecting news about the market's future cash flows and one reflecting news about the market's discount rates. Intertemporal asset pricing theory suggests that the former should have a higher price of risk; thus beta, like cholesterol, comes in "had" and "good" varieties. Empirically, we find that value stocks and small stocks have considerably higher cash-flow betas than growth stocks and large stocks, and this can explain their higher average returns. The poor performance of the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) since 1963 is explained by the fact that growth stocks and high-past-beta stocks have predominantly good betas with low risk prices. en
dc.description.sponsorship Economics en
dc.language.iso en_US en
dc.publisher American Economic Association en
dc.relation.isversionof en
dash.license LAA
dc.title Bad Beta, Good Beta en
dc.relation.journal American Economic Review en Campbell, John

Files in this item

Files Size Format View xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-files-description
campbellssrn_badbeta.pdf 533.9Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Search DASH

Advanced Search