Is the U.S. Aggregate Production Function Cobb-Douglas? New Estimates of the Elasticity of Substitution

View/ Open
Author
Published Version
https://doi.org/10.2202/1534-6005.1161Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Antras, Pol. 2004. Is the U.S. aggregate production function Cobb-Douglas? New estimates of the elasticity of substitution. Contributions to Macroeconomics 4(1): article 4.Abstract
I present new estimates of the elasticity of substitution between capital and labor using datafrom the private sector of the U.S. economy for the period 1948-1998. I first adopt Berndt’s
(1976) specification, which assumes that technological change is Hicks neutral. Consistently with
his results, I estimate elasticities of substitution that are not significantly different from one. I
next show, however, that restricting the analysis to Hicks-neutral technological change necessarily
biases the estimates of the elasticity towards one. When I modify the econometric specification
to allow for biased technical change, I obtain significantly lower estimates of the elasticity of
substitution. I conclude that the U.S. economy is not well described by a Cobb-Douglas aggregate
production function. I present estimates based on both classical regression analysis and time series
analysis. In the process, I deal with issues related to the nonsphericality of the disturbances, the
endogeneity of the regressors, and the nonstationarity of the series involved in the estimation.
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAACitable link to this page
http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:3196325
Collections
- FAS Scholarly Articles [17502]
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)