Why Long Horizons? A Study of Power Against Persistent Alternatives

View/ Open
Author
Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-5398(01)00037-8Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Campbell, John Y. 2001. Why long horizons? A study of power against persistent alternatives. Journal of Empirical Finance 8, no. 5: 459-491.Abstract
This paper studies tests of predictability in regressions with a given AR(1) regressor and an asset return dependent variable measured over a short or long horizon. The paper shows that when there is a persistent predictable component in the return, an increase in the horizon may increase the R2 statistic of the regression and the approximate slope of a predictability test. Monte Carlo experiments show that long-horizon regression tests have serious size distortions when asymptotic critical values are used, but some versions of such tests have power advantages remaining after size is corrected.Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAACitable link to this page
http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:3196341
Collections
- FAS Scholarly Articles [17845]
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)