Contrasts and Correlations in Effect-size Estimation
MetadataShow full item record
CitationRosnow, Ralph L., Robert Rosenthal, and Donald B. Rubin. 2000. Contrasts and correlations in effect-size estimation. Psychological Science 11(6): 446-453.
AbstractThis article describes procedures for presenting standardized measures of effect size when contrasts are used to ask focused questions of data. The simplest contrasts consist of comparisons of two samples (e.g., based on the independent t statistic). Useful effect-size indices in this situation are members of the g family (e.g., Hedges's g and Cohen's d) and the Pearson r. We review expressions for calculating these measures and for transforming them back and forth, and describe how to adjust formulas for obtaining g or d from t, or r from g, when the sample sizes are unequal. The real-life implications of d or g calculated from t become problematic when there are more than two groups, but the correlational approach is adaptable and interpretable, although more complex than in the case of two groups. We describe a family of four conceptually related correlation indices: the alerting correlation, the contrast correlation, the effect-size con-elation, and the BESD (binomial effect-size display) correlation. These last three correlations are identical in the simple setting of only two groups, but differ when there are move than two groups.
Citable link to this pagehttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:3199067
- FAS Scholarly Articles