One Big File Is Not Enough: A Critical Evaluation of the Dominant Free-Space Sanitization Technique
Access StatusFull text of the requested work is not available in DASH at this time ("dark deposit"). For more information on dark deposits, see our FAQ.
Malan, David J.
MetadataShow full item record
CitationGarfinkel, Simson L., and David J. Malan. 2006. One big file is not enough: a critical evaluation of the dominant free-space sanitization technique. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4258: 135-151.
AbstractMany of today’s privacy-preserving tools create a big file that fills up a hard drive or USB storage device in an effort to overwrite all of the “deleted files” that the media contain. But while this technique is widespread, it is largely unvalidated. We evaluate the effectiveness of the “big file technique” using sector-by-sector disk imaging on ﬁle systems running under Windows, Mac OS, Linux, and FreeBSD. We ﬁnd the big file is effective in overwriting file data on FAT32, NTFS, and HFS, but not on Ext2fs, Ext3fs, or Reiserfs. In one case, a total of 248 individual files consisting of 1.75MB of disk space could be recovered in their entirety. Also, file metadata such as filenames are rarely overwritten. We present a theoretical analysis of the ﬁle sanitization problem and evaluate the effectiveness of a commercial implementation that implements an improved strategy.
Citable link to this pagehttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:3203650
- FAS Scholarly Articles