Two Is Better Than One
View/
(61.34Kb)
Access Status
Full text of the requested work is not available in DASH at this time ("restricted access"). For more information on restricted deposits, see our FAQ.Author
Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01092.xMetadata
Show full item recordCitation
Kagan, Jerome. 2009. Two is better than one. Perspectives on Psychological Science 4, no. 1: 22-23.Abstract
Psychologists too often rely on only one source of evidence to affirm the validity of a construct. However, they usually do not know all the conditions that can produce the evidence they gather. Hence, the inference is often limited to the data gathered and does not generalize to other categories of information. Examples of this habit are presented along with the suggestion that all social scientists should affirm the utility of their concepts with more than one class of information.Citable link to this page
http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:3203651
Collections
- FAS Scholarly Articles [18045]
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)