Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKagan, Jerome
dc.date.accessioned2009-08-04T20:14:18Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationKagan, Jerome. 2009. Two is better than one. Perspectives on Psychological Science 4, no. 1: 22-23.en
dc.identifier.issn1745-6916en
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:3203651
dc.description.abstractPsychologists too often rely on only one source of evidence to affirm the validity of a construct. However, they usually do not know all the conditions that can produce the evidence they gather. Hence, the inference is often limited to the data gathered and does not generalize to other categories of information. Examples of this habit are presented along with the suggestion that all social scientists should affirm the utility of their concepts with more than one class of information.en
dc.description.sponsorshipPsychologyen
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishingen
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01092.xen
dash.licenseMETA_ONLY
dc.titleTwo Is Better Than Oneen
dc.relation.journalPerspectives on Psychological Scienceen
dash.depositing.authorKagan, Jerome
dash.embargo.until10000-01-01
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01092.x*
dash.contributor.affiliatedKagan, Jerome


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record