Effectiveness of Integrated Care on Delaying Progression of stage 3-4 Chronic Kidney Disease in Rural Communities of Thailand (ESCORT study): a cluster randomized controlled trial

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Effectiveness of Integrated Care on Delaying Progression of stage 3-4 Chronic Kidney Disease in Rural Communities of Thailand (ESCORT study): a cluster randomized controlled trial

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: Effectiveness of Integrated Care on Delaying Progression of stage 3-4 Chronic Kidney Disease in Rural Communities of Thailand (ESCORT study): a cluster randomized controlled trial
Author: Jiamjariyapon, Teerayuth; Ingsathit, Atiporn; Pongpirul, Krit; Vipattawat, Kotcharat; Kanchanakorn, Suphattra; Saetie, Akhathai; Kanistanon, Duangjit; Wongprompitak, Patimaporn; Leesmidt, Vinai; Watcharasaksilp, Watcharapong; Wang, Wei; Chandraker, Anil K.; Tungsanga, Kriang

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Jiamjariyapon, T., A. Ingsathit, K. Pongpirul, K. Vipattawat, S. Kanchanakorn, A. Saetie, D. Kanistanon, et al. 2017. “Effectiveness of Integrated Care on Delaying Progression of stage 3-4 Chronic Kidney Disease in Rural Communities of Thailand (ESCORT study): a cluster randomized controlled trial.” BMC Nephrology 18 (1): 83. doi:10.1186/s12882-016-0414-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-016-0414-4.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Background: In developing countries, renal specialists are scarce and physician-to-patient contact time is limited. While conventional hospital-based, physician-oriented approach has been the main focus of chronic kidney disease (CKD) care, a comprehensive multidisciplinary health care program (Integrated CKD Care) has been introduced as an alternate intervention to delay CKD progression in a community population. The main objective is to assess effectiveness of Integrated CKD Care in delaying CKD progression. Methods: We carried out a community-based, cluster randomized controlled trial. Four hundred forty-two stage 3-4 CKD patients were enrolled. In addition to the standard treatments provided to both groups, the patients in the intervention group also received “Integrated CKD Care”. This was delivered by a multidisciplinary team of hospital staff in conjunction with a community CKD care network (subdistrict healthcare officers and village health volunteers) to provide group counseling during each hospital visit and quarterly home visits to monitor compliance with the treatment. Duration of the study was 2 years. The primary outcome was difference of mean eGFR between the intervention and the control groups over the study period. Results: The mean difference of eGFR over time in the intervention group was significantly lower than the control group by 2.74 ml/min/1.73 m2 (95%CI 0.60–4.50, p = 0.009). Seventy composite clinical endpoints were reported during the study period with significantly different incidences between the control and the intervention groups (119.1 versus 69.4 per 1000 person-years; hazard ratio (HR) 0.59, 95% CI 0.4–0.9, p = 0.03). Conclusion: Integrated CKD Care can delay CKD progression in resource-limited settings. Trial registration (NCT01978951). Prospectively registered as of December 8, 2012.
Published Version: doi:10.1186/s12882-016-0414-4
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5335731/pdf/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:32071941
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters