Abstract 2374: Reconstructing the evolutionary history of metastatic cancers

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Abstract 2374: Reconstructing the evolutionary history of metastatic cancers

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: Abstract 2374: Reconstructing the evolutionary history of metastatic cancers
Author: Reiter, Johannes; Makohon-Moore, Alvin P.; Gerold, Jeffrey; Bozic, Ivana; Chatterjee, Krishnendu; Iacobuzio-Donahue, Christine A.; Vogelstein, Bert; Nowak, Martin A.

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Reiter, Johannes G., Alvin P. Makohon-Moore, Jeffrey M. Gerold, Ivana Bozic, Krishnendu Chatterjee, Christine A. Iacobuzio-Donahue, Bert Vogelstein, and Martin A. Nowak. 2016. “Abstract 2374: Reconstructing the Evolutionary History of Metastatic Cancers.” Cancer Research 76 (14 Supplement) (July 15): 2374–2374. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2016-2374.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Reconstructing the evolutionary history of metastases is critical for understanding their basic biological principles and has profound clinical implications. Genome-wide sequencing data has enabled modern phylogenomic methods to accurately dissect subclones and their phylogenies from noisy and impure bulk tumor samples at unprecedented depth. However, existing methods are not designed to infer metastatic seeding patterns. We have developed a tool, called Treeomics, that utilizes Bayesian inference and Integer Linear Programming to reconstruct the phylogeny of metastases. Treeomics allowed us to infer comprehensive seeding patterns for pancreatic, ovarian, and prostate cancers. Moreover, Treeomics correctly disambiguated true seeding patterns from sequencing artifacts; 7% of variants were misclassified by conventional statistical methods. These artifacts can skew phylogenies by creating illusory tumor heterogeneity among distinct samples. Last, we performed in silico benchmarking on simulated tumor phylogenies across a wide range of sample purities (30-90%) and sequencing depths (50-800x) to demonstrate the high accuracy of Treeomics compared to existing methods.
Published Version: doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2016-2374
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#OAP
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:32094204
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters