Civil Society Reconsidered: The Durable Nature and Community Structure of Collective Civic Action
Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1086/497351Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Sampson, Robert J., Doug McAdam, Heather MacIndoe, and Simon Weffer-Elizondo. 2005. Civil society reconsidered: The durable nature and community structure of collective civic action. American Journal of Sociology 111, no. 3: 673-714.Abstract
This article develops a conceptual framework on civil society that shifts the dominant focus on individuals to collective action events— civic and protest alike—that bring people together in public to realize a common purpose. Analyzing over 4,000 events in the Chicago area from 1970 to 2000, the authors find that while civic engagement is durable overall, “sixties-style” protest declines, and hybrid events that combine public claims making with civic forms of behavior — what they call “blended social action”—increase. Furthermore, dense social ties, group memberships, and neighborly exchange do not predict community variations in collective action. The density of nonprofit organizations matters instead, suggesting that declines in traditional social capital may not be as consequential for civic capacity as commonly thought.Other Sources
http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/soc/faculty/sampson/Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAACitable link to this page
http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:3226956
Collections
- FAS Scholarly Articles [17502]
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)
