Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSebastiani, Paolaen_US
dc.contributor.authorThyagarajan, Bharaten_US
dc.contributor.authorSun, Fanguien_US
dc.contributor.authorSchupf, Nicoleen_US
dc.contributor.authorNewman, Anne B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMontano, Montyen_US
dc.contributor.authorPerls, Thomas T.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-01T19:27:22Z
dc.date.issued2017en_US
dc.identifier.citationSebastiani, Paola, Bharat Thyagarajan, Fangui Sun, Nicole Schupf, Anne B. Newman, Monty Montano, and Thomas T. Perls. 2017. “Biomarker signatures of aging.” Aging Cell 16 (2): 329-338. doi:10.1111/acel.12557. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acel.12557.en
dc.identifier.issnen
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:32630558
dc.description.abstractSummary Because people age differently, age is not a sufficient marker of susceptibility to disabilities, morbidities, and mortality. We measured nineteen blood biomarkers that include constituents of standard hematological measures, lipid biomarkers, and markers of inflammation and frailty in 4704 participants of the Long Life Family Study (LLFS), age range 30–110 years, and used an agglomerative algorithm to group LLFS participants into clusters thus yielding 26 different biomarker signatures. To test whether these signatures were associated with differences in biological aging, we correlated them with longitudinal changes in physiological functions and incident risk of cancer, cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and mortality using longitudinal data collected in the LLFS. Signature 2 was associated with significantly lower mortality, morbidity, and better physical function relative to the most common biomarker signature in LLFS, while nine other signatures were associated with less successful aging, characterized by higher risks for frailty, morbidity, and mortality. The predictive values of seven signatures were replicated in an independent data set from the Framingham Heart Study with comparable significant effects, and an additional three signatures showed consistent effects. This analysis shows that various biomarker signatures exist, and their significant associations with physical function, morbidity, and mortality suggest that these patterns represent differences in biological aging. The signatures show that dysregulation of a single biomarker can change with patterns of other biomarkers, and age‐related changes of individual biomarkers alone do not necessarily indicate disease or functional decline.en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherJohn Wiley and Sons Inc.en
dc.relation.isversionofdoi:10.1111/acel.12557en
dc.relation.hasversionhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5334528/pdf/en
dash.licenseLAAen_US
dc.subjectOriginal Articleen
dc.subjectbiological agingen
dc.subjectbiomarkersen
dc.subjecthealthy agingen
dc.subjectmorbidity and mortalityen
dc.titleBiomarker signatures of agingen
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.description.versionVersion of Recorden
dc.relation.journalAging Cellen
dash.depositing.authorMontano, Montyen_US
dc.date.available2017-05-01T19:27:22Z
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/acel.12557*
dash.contributor.affiliatedMontano, Monty


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record