Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZajac, Laurenen_US
dc.contributor.authorKoo, Bang-Bonen_US
dc.contributor.authorBauer, Corinna M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKilliany, Ronen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-01T19:27:25Z
dc.date.issued2017en_US
dc.identifier.citationZajac, Lauren, Bang-Bon Koo, Corinna M. Bauer, and Ron Killiany. 2017. “Seed Location Impacts Whole-Brain Structural Network Comparisons between Healthy Elderly and Individuals with Alzheimer’s Disease.” Brain Sciences 7 (4): 37. doi:10.3390/brainsci7040037. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci7040037.en
dc.identifier.issnen
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:32630570
dc.description.abstractWhole-brain networks derived from diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data require the identification of seed and target regions of interest (ROIs) to assess connectivity patterns. This study investigated how initiating tracts from gray matter (GM) or white matter (WM) seed ROIs impacts (1) structural networks constructed from DTI data from healthy elderly (control) and individuals with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and (2) between-group comparisons using these networks. DTI datasets were obtained from the Alzheimer’s disease Neuroimaging Initiative database. Deterministic tractography was used to build two whole-brain networks for each subject; one in which tracts were initiated from WM ROIs and another in which they were initiated from GM ROIs. With respect to the first goal, in both groups, WM-seeded networks had approximately 400 more connections and stronger connections (as measured by number of streamlines per connection) than GM-seeded networks, but shared 94% of the connections found in the GM-seed networks. With respect to the second goal, between-group comparisons revealed a stronger subnetwork (as measured by number of streamlines per connection) in controls compared to AD using both WM-seeded and GM-seeded networks. The comparison using WM-seeded networks produced a larger (i.e., a greater number of connections) and more significant subnetwork in controls versus AD. Global, local, and nodal efficiency were greater in controls compared to AD, and between-group comparisons of these measures using WM-seeded networks had larger effect sizes than those using GM-seeded networks. These findings affirm that seed location significantly affects the ability to detect between-group differences in structural networks.en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherMDPIen
dc.relation.isversionofdoi:10.3390/brainsci7040037en
dc.relation.hasversionhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5406694/pdf/en
dash.licenseLAAen_US
dc.subjectDTIen
dc.subjectAlzheimer’s diseaseen
dc.subjectgraph theoryen
dc.subjectstructural networksen
dc.subjectMRIen
dc.subjectdiffusionen
dc.titleSeed Location Impacts Whole-Brain Structural Network Comparisons between Healthy Elderly and Individuals with Alzheimer’s Diseaseen
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.description.versionVersion of Recorden
dc.relation.journalBrain Sciencesen
dash.depositing.authorBauer, Corinna M.en_US
dc.date.available2017-05-01T19:27:25Z
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/brainsci7040037*
dash.contributor.affiliatedBauer, Corinna


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record