From “Whether” to “How”: The Varied Roles of Ideas in Politics
Author
Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199736430.001.0001Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Mehta, Jal. 2010. From ‘Whether’ to ‘How’: The Varied Roles of Ideas in Politics. In How Ideas Matter: Reframing Political Research, eds. Daniel Beland and Bob Cox. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Abstract
This chapter examines ideas of varying levels of generality that define how policymakers should act. Building upon and drawing together the best work in the field, it seeks to offer a synthetic analysis of how ideas matter in politics: what is known, what is not known, and what areas are in need of further research. It considers ideas at three levels of generality: policy solutions, problem definitions, and public philosophies or zeitgeist. It also consider interactions between the levels of ideas, with a particular interest in “upward-flowing” interactions, showing that not only does the conception of a problem constrain policy alternatives, but the fate of specific policy solutions also can have an impact on problem definitions or even broader public philosophies.Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#OAPCitable link to this page
http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33063278
Collections
- GSE Scholarly Articles [362]
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)
Comments made during the workflow steps
chapter in edited anthology/monograph