Textual criticism in Indology and in European philology during the 19th and 20th centuries
Citation
Witzel, Michael. 2014. "Textual criticism in Indology and in European philology during the 19th and 20th centuries." Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies 21 (3): 9-91.Abstract
This paper discusses the post-enlightenment development of philology in Europe during the 19th-20th centuries, particularly in the German speaking areas. After several centuries of sustained interest in the Graeco-Roman Classics, all types of medieval, older European and Asian literatures became the focus of new textual approaches. Prominent was an historical and critical approach bolstered by the newly developed MSS stemmatics and the new evidence from comparative historical linguistics. After a brief retrospective, the paper follows some of the salient features of these developments from c. 1800 CE onward: including the development of the text-critical and stemmatic method by Lachmann; early Indo-European and Neogrammarian approaches to linguistics; also, briefly, the religious and mythological approaches to the texts such as those of Max Müller; the intrusion of ‘race science’, and the increasing, if rather temporary influence of ethnology. A detailed discussion of the stemmatic approach and its later critics follows. Special attention is given to the situation in South Asian, notably in Sanskrit Studies. Finally, the paper discusses at some length the recent development of computer-based stemmatics that use biology-inspired computer programs. The paper concludeswith a discussion of the prospects of stemmatic approaches in Indology.Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAACitable link to this page
http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33077882
Collections
- FAS Scholarly Articles [18145]
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)
Comments made during the workflow steps
email editor/publisher for permission to post ejvs-list@shore.net. FAR 2014 Witzel emailed 2017-03-24 MM Witzel gave permission to post 2017-06-12: Dear Ms. Mizuta, This paper is in our open access online journal (EJVS). I am the editor. There is no objection to making it accessible in DASH. If you have any questions, plese let me know. Michael