Does temperature contain a stochastic trend? Evaluating conflicting statistical results
Access StatusFull text of the requested work is not available in DASH at this time ("restricted access"). For more information on restricted deposits, see our FAQ.
Kaufmann, Robert K.
MetadataShow full item record
CitationKaufmann, Robert K., Heikki Kauppi, and James H. Stock. 2009. “Does Temperature Contain a Stochastic Trend? Evaluating Conflicting Statistical Results.” Climatic Change 101 (3-4) (October 22): 395–405. doi:10.1007/s10584-009-9711-2.
AbstractWe evaluate the claim by Gay et al. (Clim Change 94:333–349, 2009) that “surface temperature can be better described as a trend stationary process with a one-time permanent shock” than efforts by Kaufmann et al. (Clim Change 77:249–278, 2006) to model surface temperature as a time series that contains a stochastic trend that is imparted by the time series for radiative forcing. We test this claim by comparing the in-sample forecast generated by the trend stationary model with a one-time permanent shock to the in-sample forecast generated by a cointegration/error correction model that is assumed to be stable over the 1870– 2000 sample period. Results indicate that the in-sample forecast generated by the cointegration/error correction model is more accurate than the in-sample forecast generated by the trend stationary model with a one-time permanent shock. Furthermore, Monte Carlo simulations of the cointegration/error correction model generate time series for temperature that are consistent with the trend-stationary-with-a-break result generated by Gay et al. (Clim Change 94:333–349, 2009), while the time series for radiative forcing cannot be modeled as trend stationary with a one-time shock. Based on these results, we argue that modeling surface temperature as a time series that shares a stochastic trend with radiative forcing offers the possibility of greater insights regarding the potential causes of climate change and efforts to slow its progression.
Citable link to this pagehttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33201420
- FAS Scholarly Articles 
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)
Comments made during the workflow stepsStock emailed 2016-04-24 MM Stock emailed 2017-03-24 MM meta.dark