Impact of a community-based package of interventions on child development in Zambia: a cluster-randomised controlled trial

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Impact of a community-based package of interventions on child development in Zambia: a cluster-randomised controlled trial

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: Impact of a community-based package of interventions on child development in Zambia: a cluster-randomised controlled trial
Author: Rockers, Peter C; Fink, Günther; Zanolini, Arianna; Banda, Bowen; Biemba, Godfrey; Sullivan, Cierra; Mutembo, Simon; Silavwe, Vichaels; Hamer, Davidson H

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Rockers, Peter C, Günther Fink, Arianna Zanolini, Bowen Banda, Godfrey Biemba, Cierra Sullivan, Simon Mutembo, Vichaels Silavwe, and Davidson H Hamer. 2016. “Impact of a community-based package of interventions on child development in Zambia: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.” BMJ Global Health 1 (3): e000104. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000104.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Background: Community-based programmes are a critical platform for improving child health and development. We tested the impact of a community-based early childhood intervention package in rural Zambia. Methods: We conducted a non-blinded cluster randomised controlled trial in Southern Province, Zambia. 30 clusters of villages were matched based on population density and distance from the nearest health centre, and randomly assigned to intervention (15 clusters and 268 caregiver–child dyads) or control (15 clusters and 258 caregiver–child dyads). Caregivers were eligible if they had a child aged 6–12 months at baseline. In intervention clusters, health workers screened children for infections and malnutrition, and invited caregivers to attend fortnightly group meetings covering a nutrition and child development curriculum. 220 intervention and 215 control dyads were evaluated after 1 year. The primary outcomes were stunting and INTERGROWTH-21st neurodevelopmental assessment (NDA) scores. Weight-for-age and height-for-age z-scores based on WHO growth standards were also analysed. Secondary outcomes were child illness symptoms, dietary intake and caregiver–child interactions based on self-report. Impact was estimated using intention-to-treat analysis. Results: The intervention package was associated with a 0.12 SD increase in weight-for-age (95% CI −0.14 to 0.38), a 0.15 SD increase in height-for-age (95% CI −0.18 to 0.48) and a reduction in stunting (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.36 to 1.28), whereas there was no measurable impact on NDA score. Children receiving the intervention package had fewer symptoms, a more diverse diet and more caregiver interactions. Conclusions: In settings like Zambia, community-based early childhood programmes appear to be feasible and appreciated by caregivers, as evidenced by high rates of uptake. The intervention package improved parenting behaviours and had a small positive, though statistically insignificant, impact on child development. Given the short time frame of the project, larger developmental impact is likely if differential parenting behaviours persist. Trial registration number NCT02234726; Results.
Published Version: doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000104
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5321359/pdf/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33490916
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters