The effect of subcutaneous fat on electrical impedance myography when using a handheld electrode array: The case for measuring reactance

DSpace/Manakin Repository

The effect of subcutaneous fat on electrical impedance myography when using a handheld electrode array: The case for measuring reactance

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: The effect of subcutaneous fat on electrical impedance myography when using a handheld electrode array: The case for measuring reactance
Author: Sung, Minhee; Spieker, Andrew J.; Narayanaswami, Pushpa; Rutkove, Seward Brian

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Sung, Minhee, Andrew J. Spieker, Pushpa Narayanaswami, and Seward B. Rutkove. 2013. “The Effect of Subcutaneous Fat on Electrical Impedance Myography When Using a Handheld Electrode Array: The Case for Measuring Reactance.” Clinical Neurophysiology 124 (2) (February): 400–404. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2012.07.013.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Objective

Recent developments in electrical impedance myography (EIM) have led to the use of handheld electrode arrays (HEA) for data acquisition. Although preferable for several reasons, this approach tends to be more affected by subcutaneous fat (SF) than the original approach in which the impedance-measuring electrodes are widely spaced. In this study, we seek to identify the EIM parameter least impacted by subcutaneous fat (SF) when using an HEA.

Methods

18 normal subjects underwent 50 kHz EIM and ultrasound of the medial gastrocnemius muscles on the dominant side. Coefficients of determination (R2 values) were calculated for each of the three major EIM variables (reactance, resistance, and phase) and SF thickness.

Results

For both resistance and phase, a strong relationship to SF thickness was observed (R2 = 0.64 and R2 = 0.70, respectively, p < 0.001 for both). In contrast, for reactance, the relationship was non-significant, with R2 = 0.07, p = 0.30.

Conclusions

Unlike resistance and phase, both of which are highly impacted by SF thickness, the reactance shows no significant relationship.

Significance

Future clinical studies employing HEA’s to perform EIM should evaluate alterations in reactance over those in resistance and phase.
Published Version: doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2012.07.013
Other Sources: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3543755/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:34216311
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters