Similarities and differences between on-scalp and conventional in-helmet magnetoencephalography recordings

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Similarities and differences between on-scalp and conventional in-helmet magnetoencephalography recordings

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: Similarities and differences between on-scalp and conventional in-helmet magnetoencephalography recordings
Author: Andersen, Lau M.; Oostenveld, Robert; Pfeiffer, Christoph; Ruffieux, Silvia; Jousmäki, Veikko; Hämäläinen, Matti; Schneiderman, Justin F.; Lundqvist, Daniel

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Andersen, Lau M., Robert Oostenveld, Christoph Pfeiffer, Silvia Ruffieux, Veikko Jousmäki, Matti Hämäläinen, Justin F. Schneiderman, and Daniel Lundqvist. 2017. “Similarities and differences between on-scalp and conventional in-helmet magnetoencephalography recordings.” PLoS ONE 12 (7): e0178602. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0178602. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178602.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: The development of new magnetic sensor technologies that promise sensitivities approaching that of conventional MEG technology while operating at far lower operating temperatures has catalysed the growing field of on-scalp MEG. The feasibility of on-scalp MEG has been demonstrated via benchmarking of new sensor technologies performing neuromagnetic recordings in close proximity to the head surface against state-of-the-art in-helmet MEG sensor technology. However, earlier work has provided little information about how these two approaches compare, or about the reliability of observed differences. Herein, we present such a comparison, based on recordings of the N20m component of the somatosensory evoked field as elicited by electric median nerve stimulation. As expected from the proximity differences between the on-scalp and in-helmet sensors, the magnitude of the N20m activation as recorded with the on-scalp sensor was higher than that of the in-helmet sensors. The dipole pattern of the on-scalp recordings was also more spatially confined than that of the conventional recordings. Our results furthermore revealed unexpected temporal differences in the peak of the N20m component. An analysis protocol was therefore developed for assessing the reliability of this observed difference. We used this protocol to examine our findings in terms of differences in sensor sensitivity between the two types of MEG recordings. The measurements and subsequent analysis raised attention to the fact that great care has to be taken in measuring the field close to the zero-line crossing of the dipolar field, since it is heavily dependent on the orientation of sensors. Taken together, our findings provide reliable evidence that on-scalp and in-helmet sensors measure neural sources in mostly similar ways.
Published Version: doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0178602
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5524409/pdf/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:34375116
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters