Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAshkenazy, Yosef
dc.contributor.authorTziperman, Eli
dc.date.accessioned2009-12-08T18:42:59Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.citationAshkenazy, Yosef, and Eli Tziperman. 2004. Are the 41kyr glacial oscillations a linear response to Milankovitch forcing? Quaternary Science Reviews 23(18-19): 1879-1890.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0277-3791en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:3441486
dc.description.abstractThe characteristics of glacial oscillations changed drastically ~0.8Ma ago, at the ‘‘mid-Pleistocene transition’’. During the past 0.8Ma the ~100 kyr glacial–interglacial oscillations were strongly asymmetric (i.e., long glacial intervals of growth followed by rapid intervals of deglaciation). The 40 kyr oscillations prior to the mid-Pleistocene transition were of a smaller amplitude and less-asymmetrical looking. The smaller amplitude, apparently symmetric form and period that matches that of obliquity, suggests that these oscillations were a linear response to Milankovitch forcing, while the 100 kyr oscillations are attributed either to some nonlinear self-sustained variability due to a mechanism internal to the climate system itself or to nonlinear amplification of the insolation forcing. The significant strengthening of the 100 kyr eccentricity power in the past ~800 kyr is one of the intriguing questions of climate history. Here we show that glacial–interglacial oscillations pre-mid-Pleistocene transition are, in fact, significantly asymmetric. This asymmetry may contradict a straight forward linear Milankovitch explanation, and we therefore suggest that the glacial oscillations before and after the transition may both be explained as self-sustained variability (although the possibility of nonlinear response to insolation forcing still exists). The role of Milankovitch forcing is in setting the phase of the oscillations (e.g. time of terminations) and their period, rather in being the main driving force of the oscillations. This is demonstrated using a simple model based on the sea ice switch mechanism of Gildor and Tziperman (Paleoceanography 15 (2000) 605).en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipEarth and Planetary Sciencesen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2004.04.008en_US
dash.licenseMETA_ONLY
dc.titleAre the 41kyr Glacial Oscillations a Linear Response to Milankovitch Forcing?en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.description.versionVersion of Recorden_US
dc.relation.journalQuaternary Science Reviewsen_US
dash.depositing.authorTziperman, Eli
dash.embargo.until10000-01-01
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.quascirev.2004.04.008*
dash.contributor.affiliatedTziperman, Eli


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record