Evolutionary morphology of the lizard chemosensory system

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Evolutionary morphology of the lizard chemosensory system

Citable link to this page


Title: Evolutionary morphology of the lizard chemosensory system
Author: Baeckens, Simon; Herrel, Anthony; Broeckhoven, Chris; Vasilopoulou-Kampitsi, Menelia; Huyghe, Katleen; Goyens, Jana; Van Damme, Raoul

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Baeckens, Simon, Anthony Herrel, Chris Broeckhoven, Menelia Vasilopoulou-Kampitsi, Katleen Huyghe, Jana Goyens, and Raoul Van Damme. 2017. “Evolutionary morphology of the lizard chemosensory system.” Scientific Reports 7 (1): 10141. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-09415-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09415-7.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Foraging mode plays a pivotal role in traditional reconstructions of squamate evolution. Transitions between modes are said to spark concerted changes in the morphology, physiology, behaviour, and life history of lizards. With respect to their sensory systems, species that adopt a sit-and-wait strategy are thought to rely on visual cues primarily, while actively hunting species would predominantly use chemical information. The morphology of the tongue and the vomeronasal-organs is believed to mirror this dichotomy. Still, support for this idea of concerted evolution of the morphology of the lizard sensory system merely originates from studies comparing only a few, distantly related taxa that differ in many aspects of their biology besides foraging mode. Hence, we compared vomeronasal-lingual morphology among closely related lizard species (Lacertidae). Our findings show considerable interspecific variation indicating that the chemosensory system of lacertids has undergone substantial change over a short evolutionary time. Although our results imply independent evolution of tongue and vomeronasal-organ form, we find evidence for co-variation between sampler and sensor, hinting towards an ‘optimization’ for efficient chemoreception. Furthermore, our findings suggest species’ degree of investment in chemical signalling, and not foraging behaviour, as a leading factor driving the diversity in vomeronasal-lingual morphology among lacertid species.
Published Version: doi:10.1038/s41598-017-09415-7
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5583331/pdf/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:34492120
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)


Search DASH

Advanced Search