Competency in supportive supervision: a study of public sector medicines management supervisors in Uganda

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Competency in supportive supervision: a study of public sector medicines management supervisors in Uganda

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: Competency in supportive supervision: a study of public sector medicines management supervisors in Uganda
Author: Henry, Rachael; Nantongo, Lynda; Wagner, Anita Katharina; Embrey, Martha; Trap, Birna

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Henry, Rachael, Lynda Nantongo, Anita Katharina Wagner, Martha Embrey, and Birna Trap. 2017. “Competency in supportive supervision: a study of public sector medicines management supervisors in Uganda.” Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice 10 (1): 33. doi:10.1186/s40545-017-0121-y. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-017-0121-y.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Background: Supportive supervision has been found to be more effective than corrective fault-oriented inspections. Uganda’s Ministry of Health in 2012 implemented a comprehensive strategy (SPARS) to build medicines management capacity in public sector health facilities. The approach includes supportive supervision. This structured observational study assesses supportive supervision competency among medicines management supervisors (MMS). Method The study used structured observations of two groups of five purposely selected MMS—one group supervising facilities with greater medicines management improvement during one year of SPARS and one group with less improvement, based on quantitative metrics. We observed and scored behaviors and skills of supervisors in 11 categories deemed critical for effective and supportive supervision. Results: Supportive supervision was not evenly or adequately implemented, with the median supportive supervision competency score for all observed supervisors being 38%. Supervisors’ main strengths were problem identification, data interpretation, education, and providing constructive feedback (45%–47%). Their weakest areas were assuring continuity and setting targets (17%), and most MMS were fair to strong in effective communication, use of tools, and problem solving. MMS of facilities with little improvement in medicines management over time were weak in setting targets and promoting participation. There was a 33 percentage point difference in the median supportive supervision competency scores between MMS of facilities with more versus less improvement (57%–24%) and a 77 percentage point difference in competency between the highest and lowest scoring MMS (77%–0%). We did not find a relationship between MMS experience (number of visits implemented) and their supportive supervision competency or facility improvement in medicines management. However, there is a likely relationship between supportive supervision competency and facility improvement. Conclusion: Competency of MMS in supportive supervision among the sampled MMS was generally weak, but with much individual variation. Our results suggest that MMS’ supportive supervision competency is positively related to the SPARS effectiveness scores of the facilities they supervise. We recommend strategies to strengthen supportive supervision behaviors and skills. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s40545-017-0121-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Published Version: doi:10.1186/s40545-017-0121-y
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5637320/pdf/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:34492335
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters