Preclinical Alzheimer's disease and longitudinal driving decline

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Preclinical Alzheimer's disease and longitudinal driving decline

Citable link to this page


Title: Preclinical Alzheimer's disease and longitudinal driving decline
Author: Roe, Catherine M.; Babulal, Ganesh M.; Head, Denise M.; Stout, Sarah H.; Vernon, Elizabeth K.; Ghoshal, Nupur; Garland, Brad; Barco, Peggy P.; Williams, Monique M.; Johnson, Ann; Fierberg, Rebecca; Fague, M. Scot; Xiong, Chengjie; Mormino, Elizabeth; Grant, Elizabeth A.; Holtzman, David M.; Benzinger, Tammie L.S.; Fagan, Anne M.; Ott, Brian R.; Carr, David B.; Morris, John C.

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Roe, C. M., G. M. Babulal, D. M. Head, S. H. Stout, E. K. Vernon, N. Ghoshal, B. Garland, et al. 2016. “Preclinical Alzheimer's disease and longitudinal driving decline.” Alzheimer's & Dementia : Translational Research & Clinical Interventions 3 (1): 74-82. doi:10.1016/j.trci.2016.11.006.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Introduction: Links between preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD) and driving difficulty onset would support the use of driving performance as an outcome in primary and secondary prevention trials among older adults (OAs). We examined whether AD biomarkers predicted the onset of driving difficulties among OAs. Methods: One hundred four OAs (65+ years) with normal cognition took part in biomarker measurements, a road test, clinical and psychometric batteries, and self-reported their driving habits. Results: Higher values of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tau/Aβ42 and phosphorylated tau (ptau181)/Aβ42 ratios, but not uptake on Pittsburgh compound B amyloid imaging (P = .12), predicted time to a rating of marginal or fail on the driving test using Cox proportional hazards models. Hazards ratios (95% confidence interval) were 5.75 (1.70–19.53), P = .005 for CSF tau/Aβ42; 6.19 (1.75–21.88), and P = .005 for CSF ptau181/Aβ42. Discussion Preclinical AD predicted time to receiving a marginal or fail rating on an on-road driving test. Driving performance shows promise as a functional outcome in AD prevention trials.
Published Version: doi:10.1016/j.trci.2016.11.006
Other Sources:
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at
Citable link to this page:
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)


Search DASH

Advanced Search